Clemson Tigers Tackle Another Cupcake Schedule?
Perhaps a tad unfair…though they do start out with a laughable first few games and play in the perennially weak ACC…but ESPN seems to think Clemson has the most laughable schedule in college football this year. I tend not to agree, but if ESPN says something bad about Clemson, it’s likely I need to agree. Soon enough they’ll get back to blatantly pulling against the Gamecocks on our ESPN games and fainting when the Tigers brush that stupid rock.
“It would be tempting to say Wisconsin has this year’s phoniest cupcake-enhanced sked, but that distinction goes to Clemson: The Tigers open by hosting North Texas, which is on a 5-31 streak, then the next week host Division I-AA Presbyterian, which finished 0-11 in 2009, including a 34-point defeat by Elon. Here is Clemson’s schedule — that’s the real schedule, not a spoof.”
Read more at ESPN’s Tuesday Morning Quarterback Eats Some Cupcakes
Why College Football is Better than NFL
Now here’s a bitter rivalry that happens every year that no one’s ever going to win. I fall into the “College” football camp, myself, but if I were to explain why, clearly, it’s so much better than the NFL, I don’t think I could do it better than this article (the included image doesn’t have anything to do with the article, don’t worry).
Excerpt – #4 Lack of Parity
Parity sucks. Parity’s great in the sense that “every team has a chance”, but that’s where its virtues end. With parity, teams are less spectacular, teams are better matched, and consequently, the play is less exciting. Parity means that punt returns are stopped after five yards, that linebackers never block field goals, and that a running game is effectively neutralized by an opposing defense……..
………A lack of parity means there are Davids and Goliaths. But occasionally, the underdogs make a miracle happen (hello, Appalachian State!) that resonates so profoundly that it serves as a reminder of why it’s not always best when teams are evenly matched week-in and week-out.
